Sunday, August 5, 2007

WHY HAS ART CHANGED SO MUCH?


Why is the art of today so different than the art of yester-year?
To answer that question adequately, one would have to know something of the philosophy and culture of previous ages. Art both leads and follows the path of a culture's development. It is probably true and most accurate to say that philosophy drives art.

In the west, say, in the Middle Ages, the artist was a crafts person and most art was utilitarian - functional in nature. It was decorative and filled the ordinary lives of people. In the Renaissance the status of the artist changed and they moved from being a servant of the patron to acquire celebrity status. This was a significant change.

In addition to the celebrity status of the Renaissance artist, the artist was called upon to invent all sorts of things -- from the composition of the subject to the ways in which the art would be used, or seen.

As the merchant class grew, more people could afford art, and the Catholic church was no longer the primary patron of the arts. Now, the church, the wealthy, the merchant class and the average person could afford art. In Italy, the Medici family spent fortunes on art, not only buying it, but in creating a market for it. They were shrewd enough to realize that there was real money to be made from the production and purchase of art.

In the twentieth century, some artists think of themselves as as much more than celebrities. They think of themselves as autonomous from the culture, doing what they want and serving nothing other than their own sensibilities.

The old patrons of the arts have all but disappeared - though new ones have emerged. Rather than making art to beautify the world, many artists of today express only themselves for themselves. They say they are making "art for art's sake," but we see that the result of some of their work is not as beneficial for culture as one might think it could be. Much are has become pathologically narcissistic.

Finally, there are so many more areas of the arts than before. Now there is everything from fashion to animation, from computer images to installation art, from painting to hip-hop. Art spans not just the visual arts but performing arts and music as well. The boundaries have been blended and blurred, not accidentally but deliberately under the banner of creative freedom as well as necessity.

Art in the west has evolved and continues to evolve.

What do you think art will become in the future?

Where do you think all this "creativity" is going?
Do you think it is good for the art world to be where it is, or is it not so good, and why?

What are your thoughts on the evolution of the arts in our own culture, or even cross culturally?

(Photo at the top is Raphael's depiction of removing the dead Christ from the cross.)

No comments: